Black|RudderGossamer Thread
Sources/GT-S-3E6EA35D835F

Context source · GT-S-3E6EA35D835F

Brett Forrest, 'How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine,' Wall Street Journal, 15 March 2023

Original sourceNews report
Open full document ↗
SHA-256 3e6ea35d835f2450c36f…5 pages · 2 MB

DISTILLATES

What the source contains

Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.

observationobservation

15 March 2023 publication versus 30 October 2025 print header; the Exhibit D wrapper has no demonstrated filing date.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT D
observationobservation

1,000 K8 units is the quantity in the letter WSJ says it reviewed, not an established award or delivered quantity.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
assumptionassumption

The journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks ori

The journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks original selection and approval records needed to adopt that mechanism as fact.

claimallegation

The five-page file contains an Exhibit D wrapper and a four-page WSJ print capture of How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small D

The five-page file contains an Exhibit D wrapper and a four-page WSJ print capture of How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine. Embedded text identifies Brett Forrest, March 15, 2023 at 9:02 am ET, with Matthew Luxmoore and Lisa Schwartz contributing. The print header is October 30, 2025 at 1:34 pm. The wrapper supplies no docket, sponsor, filing stamp or admission ruling; publication, print and exhibit use are separate events.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT D
claimallegation

The article reports a December OTC Markets caveat-emptor designation and roughly 80% price fall, and explains several generic reasons for th

The article reports a December OTC Markets caveat-emptor designation and roughly 80% price fall, and explains several generic reasons for that label. OTC declines to state the actual reason. Schmidt attributes it to an unnamed company lawyer’s stock-disclosure failure; that lawyer declines comment. The generic reasons are not a specific fraud finding, and the unnamed lawyer is not resolved from outside assumptions.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
claimallegation

The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD decline

The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD declined quantity/timeline details and executives did not yet know them. A listed assistance item and expected purchase do not establish a signed award, unit count, delivery date, advance payment or acceptance.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
claimallegation

The background describes low-cost reconnaissance/attack drones and security concerns about Chinese DJI products. DJI’s representative says i

The background describes low-cost reconnaissance/attack drones and security concerns about Chinese DJI products. DJI’s representative says its products are civilian only, and the report attributes suspension of Russia/Ukraine activity and no flight-data collection to DJI. These opposing contextual statements are not source-proved espionage, a current product assessment or evidence of Cyberlux security qualification.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The article quotes Fortem CEO Jon Gruen and Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson about procurement barriers, describing two Fortem systems and roughly

The article quotes Fortem CEO Jon Gruen and Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson about procurement barriers, describing two Fortem systems and roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle drones in Ukraine. Those company experiences contextualise the journalist’s thesis; they neither independently verify the K8 deal nor establish every manufacturer’s legal or procurement status.

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
claimallegation

Photo captions credit Serhii Korovayny/WSJ for K8 material, AFP/Getty for a Bakhmut serviceman, Fortem for a capture demonstration and the U

Photo captions credit Serhii Korovayny/WSJ for K8 material, AFP/Getty for a Bakhmut serviceman, Fortem for a capture demonstration and the Ukrainian Presidential Press Office/AP for a February Zaluzhny image. The latter caption expressly depicts a different February event while reporting attendance at the earlier demonstration. Blank capture images cannot be described as inspected photographs or treated as proof of who attended.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The source is original WSJ reporting containing a mixture of author narrative, Schmidt claims, other company views, attributed official comm

The source is original WSJ reporting containing a mixture of author narrative, Schmidt claims, other company views, attributed official comments and a letter the reporter says was reviewed. The corpus has read this article, not the reporter’s interview notes or that letter. Repetition of this story in later commentary does not create new independent evidence of the underlying events.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The original article pages visibly clip line starts and ends and leave several captioned photographs blank. Embedded PDF text retains the co

The original article pages visibly clip line starts and ends and leave several captioned photographs blank. Embedded PDF text retains the complete lines, including byline/date. A local inspection copy with clipping operations removed and page bounds expanded confirmed the recoverable text; it is an inspection transformation, not a new original or repaired evidence file. Native text and original PDF remain preserved, and absent images are not reconstructed.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The report frames small drones as an opening for lesser-known firms within more than $32 billion in approved Ukraine security assistance. It

The report frames small drones as an opening for lesser-known firms within more than $32 billion in approved Ukraine security assistance. It says Cyberlux had unsuccessfully pitched the Pentagon and then took a modified movie-production drone directly to Ukraine. Its wording that the Pentagon appears set to buy is prospective at March 2023, not a executed contract, paid order or accepted delivery.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement sys

The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement system or being ejected. It attributes the connection to senior Ukrainian officials through an unnamed US drone expert to Schmidt. The expert is not identified as Curtin, Tucker, Maadarani or another actor; the metaphor and access route are not an admission of unlawful conduct.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
claimallegation

The report describes Cyberlux’s earlier LED business, a March-2022 purchase of Catalyst Machineworks and a quoted website description of a f

The report describes Cyberlux’s earlier LED business, a March-2022 purchase of Catalyst Machineworks and a quoted website description of a few-person cinelifter business with family-handled shipping. The acquisition’s exact legal/asset scope, production capacity, qualification and later workforce are not demonstrated by that brief description or an attached agreement.

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
claimallegation

The reported demonstration outside Kyiv included Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, a K8 strike on a static armoured personnel carrier and a camera dron

The reported demonstration outside Kyiv included Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, a K8 strike on a static armoured personnel carrier and a camera drone relaying the explosion. The article does not identify the configuration, performance criteria, independent test record, US acceptance procedure or broader production capability. A demonstration description is not qualified acceptance or proof of contractual compliance.

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
claimallegation

The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. T

The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
claimallegation

A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spo

A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spokesman is the stated source for assignment to Naval Air Systems Command. These are different attributed statements with different specificity, rather than independent confirmations of every element of Schmidt’s narrative.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
claimallegation

The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the

The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
entityobservation

Brett Forrest

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
entityobservation

SZ DJI Technology Co.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
entityobservation

Fortem Technologies Inc.

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Jon Gruen

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Red Cat Holdings Inc.

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Jeff Thompson

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Cyberlux Corp.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
entityobservation

Mark Schmidt

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
entityobservation

Catalyst Machineworks

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Valeriy Zaluzhny

Read the anchor · page 3
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 2 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 DJI has previously said that it had suspended activity in both Russia and Ukraine in April and that the company doesn’t collect data from flights. “Our products are for civilian use only,” a DJI spokeswoman said. “We have never manufactured military-grade equipment.” A Ukrainian serviceman operates a drone in Bakhmut, Ukraine. DIMITAR DILKOFF/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES Cyberlux, whose main business for the past two decades has been in long-duration LED lights, is new to the drone market. In March last year, it bought Catalyst Machineworks, a small Houston-area drone maker that specializes in quadcopters, also known as cinelifters, for racing leagues, as well as film and TV production. A website for the drone company said that it comprised “only a few people” and that “shipping is handled by one of the owner’s wives.” Cyberlux is one of many small companies that have sought to pierce the Pentagon’s bureaucracy. Fortem Technologies Inc., a Salt Lake City-area company that manufactures DroneHunter, a small reconnaissance model designed to knock down enemy drones, has sent two systems to Ukraine but has been unable to secure Pentagon approval for more. “It’s very hard for our bureaucratic system to look past what it knows best, which are programs of record,” said Jon Gruen, Fortem’s CEO, referring to the Pentagon’s method of buying technology as part of a long-term budgeting cycle. Red Cat Holdings Inc., a Puerto Rico-based company, has placed roughly two dozen Teal Golden Eagle reconnaissance drones in Ukraine but has also been stymied at the Pentagon. “The Ukrainians want them,” Red Cat CEO Jeff Thompson said. “They’re already using them. How do we get these tools into Ukraine? It’s very frustrating for us and other small drone companies.” Cyberlux took a different angle, via a U.S. drone expert. The expert connected Cyberlux with senior officials in Kyiv, according to Mr. Schmidt, and in July, he traveled to Poland and crossed the border into Ukraine. At a testing ground outside the capital, Cyberlux demonstrated its drone to Ukrainian officials, including Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the country’s armed forces. The Cyberlux K8 zipped across a field toward a static armored personnel carrier, trailed by another drone fitted with a video camera that captured the explosion as the drone made contact with the vehicle and relayed the footage to a screen visible to the soldiers and officials present. A Fortem Technologies drone captures another drone by firing a net. FORTEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
entityobservation

Denys Sharapov

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
entityobservation

Naval Air Systems Command

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
entityobservation

Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
entityobservation

OTC Markets Group Inc.

Read the anchor · page 4
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 3 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 Following the demonstrations, Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Denys Sharapov, in a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, requested 1,000 K8 drones from the U.S. European Command. “We submit requests to cover the priority needs of the defense forces of Ukraine to the Pentagon through official channels,” a Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman said, declining to comment specifically on the K8. The Pentagon assigned Ukraine’s Cyberlux request to the Naval Air Systems Command, which works with airborne-weapons systems, including drones, according to a Defense Department spokesman. In November, the naval command paired Cyberlux with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc., a Virginia shipbuilder that already has extensive contracts with the Pentagon, Mr. Schmidt said. Working with an established company allowed Cyberlux to bypass the months or years it might take for a small firm to break through military-procurement bureaucracy, which requires many layers of approvals and voluminous documentation. A Huntington Ingalls Industries spokesman declined to comment. As Cyberlux executives believed that their drone deal had reached its final stages, a stock regulator’s public reprimand threatened to undo it by hurting the company’s credibility. Cyberlux’s K8 drone presentation in Kyiv region, Ukraine, last summer. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL In December, OTC Markets Group Inc. designated Cyberlux’s stock as caveat emptor, a buyer-beware label caused by misleading or manipulative stock promotion, an investigation of fraud, or the suspension of trading for public-interest concern. Some brokerages restrict investors’ abilities to trade caveat emptor securities. Cyberlux’s stock price fell roughly 80% to less than a fraction of a penny following the December designation. An OTC Markets Group official declined to comment on the reason for the designation. Mr. Schmidt said the label resulted from a Cyberlux lawyer failing to disclose the extent of his company stock in financial filings. The lawyer declined to comment. “We are an OTC company, and so things are kind of Wild West-ish,” Mr. Schmidt said. “It’ll be cleaned up and straightened out.” Last month, on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pentagon announced $2 billion in security assistance for Ukraine. On the list of equipment, which Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, here at a February event in Kyiv,Ukraine, attended Cyberlux’s drone presentation last summer. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
eventattribution

The embedded byline block dates the article 15 March 2023 at 9:02 am ET.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
eventattribution

The capture header states 30 October 2025 at 1:34 pm, with no timezone supplied.

Read the anchor · page 2
10/30/25, 1:34 pmHow a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine - WSJ Page 1 of 4https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. Fornon-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-a-penny-stock-company-sold-pentagon-on-small-drones-for-ukraine-31127092 How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on SmallDrones for UkraineCyberlux CEO’s trip to Kyiv helps short-circuit Defense Department’s lumbering procurement system By Brett ForrestFollow March 15, 2023 9:02 am ET Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year, the U.S. has approved more than $32 billion in security assistance for Kyiv, with most of that money going to weaponry produced by major defense companies. Small drones have provided an opening for lesser-known firms to compete, and at least one has succeeded. Cyberlux Corp., a penny-stock company traded on the over-the-counter market, recently made a foray into drone production and had pitched the Pentagon for Ukraine business without luck. So executives with the North Carolina lighting company decided to cut through the U.S. military’s red tape and take its product directly to the Ukrainians. In July, Cyberlux Chief Executive Mark Schmidt raced to Kyiv under military escort with a modified movie-production drone he hoped could help Ukraine’s military repel the Russian invasion. Now, eight months later, the Pentagon appears set to buy the Cyberlux K8 and deliver the machinery to Ukraine. “We’re a virus that’s inside the body of DOD,” said Mr. Schmidt of the company’s path to the Pentagon, referring to the Department of Defense. “We’re either going to influence the way they do things in the future, or be ejected from the body.” The journey that Cyberlux took from North Carolina to Kyiv provides a window into how a number of small defense companies are attempting to navigate—and in some cases circumvent—the Pentagon bureaucracy to get their weapons to Ukraine. It also shows how drones’ increased usage in modern warfare has created new business opportunities. Both Russia and Ukraine employ reconnaissance drones, allowing operators to survey battlefields and locate targets with little risk to operators. Ukraine has used American- made suicide drones, which fly into objects and detonate on contact, while Russia has deployed Iranian models. These types of drones are relatively small and inexpensive and manufactured with many consumer-technology components. At the start of the war, Ukrainian forces were using drones produced by China’s SZ DJI Technology Co.—effective, low-cost models that had come to dominate the U.S. hobbyist market. But Ukrainian and American officials grew concerned that the Chinese drones, which the U.S. government had already stopped using, posed a security risk and began seeking alternatives. Cyberlux showed how its K8 drone operated during its CEO’s trip to Ukraine last year. SERHII KOROVAYNY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
hypothesishypothesis

Direct Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, refer

Direct Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

inferenceinference

At publication the article records an expected purchase and assistance announcement while retaining unknown quantity and timing. Later award

At publication the article records an expected purchase and assistance announcement while retaining unknown quantity and timing. Later awards or payments cannot be back-projected into that source horizon.

inferenceinference

Schmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent l

Schmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

otherattribution

Complete supplied 5-page source reviewed at SHA-256 3e6ea35d835f2450c36f7db530758ccc87f591a6f21cd82afc2c16b2c368ab3e. Source assertions, ori

Complete supplied 5-page source reviewed at SHA-256 3e6ea35d835f2450c36f7db530758ccc87f591a6f21cd82afc2c16b2c368ab3e. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. The source is an Exhibit D wrapper plus a WSJ print capture. Publication, later capture and unidentified exhibit use retain separate provenance. Reporter attribution is not independent verification of each interviewee claim.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT D
questionquestion

What original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procuremen

What original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procurement route?

questionquestion

Who was the unnamed US drone expert, and what primary record identifies the person rather than guessing from later narratives?

questionquestion

Which dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract

Which dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract and delivery events?

questionquestion

What actual OTC notice and disclosure records establish the designation’s reason and the unnamed lawyer’s identity?

questionquestion

Which clean capture, original images and exhibit filing record resolve visual omissions and the provenance of the Exhibit D wrapper?

questionquestion

Which later articles cite this exact story and preserve its byline, attribution and prospective March-2023 limits?

questionquestion

Does this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

allegation

CONNECT

Reviewed relationships

The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.

Contemporaneous reporting forms part of the public context for the K8 / Ukraine procurement pathway.supports{"timeline_thread":"programme","timeline_thread_label":"Procurement & programme"}

This reviewed database occurrence and exact public source passage document the dated event in the public chronology.

94%
Confidence 94%Link weight 94%
The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.supportsDoes this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsDoes this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spokesman is the stated source for assignment to Naval Air Systems Command. These are different attributed statements with different specificity, rather than independent confirmations of every element of Schmidt’s narrative.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsWhich dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract and delivery events?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The five-page file contains an Exhibit D wrapper and a four-page WSJ print capture of How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine. Embedded text identifies Brett Forrest, March 15, 2023 at 9:02 am ET, with Matthew Luxmoore and Lisa Schwartz contributing. The print header is October 30, 2025 at 1:34 pm. The wrapper supplies no docket, sponsor, filing stamp or admission ruling; publication, print and exhibit use are separate events.supportsWhich later articles cite this exact story and preserve its byline, attribution and prospective March-2023 limits?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD declined quantity/timeline details and executives did not yet know them. A listed assistance item and expected purchase do not establish a signed award, unit count, delivery date, advance payment or acceptance.supportsWhich dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract and delivery events?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement system or being ejected. It attributes the connection to senior Ukrainian officials through an unnamed US drone expert to Schmidt. The expert is not identified as Curtin, Tucker, Maadarani or another actor; the metaphor and access route are not an admission of unlawful conduct.supportsWho was the unnamed US drone expert, and what primary record identifies the person rather than guessing from later narratives?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The source is original WSJ reporting containing a mixture of author narrative, Schmidt claims, other company views, attributed official comments and a letter the reporter says was reviewed. The corpus has read this article, not the reporter’s interview notes or that letter. Repetition of this story in later commentary does not create new independent evidence of the underlying events.supportsWhich later articles cite this exact story and preserve its byline, attribution and prospective March-2023 limits?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Direct Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.supportsWhat original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procurement route?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks original selection and approval records needed to adopt that mechanism as fact.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD declined quantity/timeline details and executives did not yet know them. A listed assistance item and expected purchase do not establish a signed award, unit count, delivery date, advance payment or acceptance.supportsDoes this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement system or being ejected. It attributes the connection to senior Ukrainian officials through an unnamed US drone expert to Schmidt. The expert is not identified as Curtin, Tucker, Maadarani or another actor; the metaphor and access route are not an admission of unlawful conduct.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spokesman is the stated source for assignment to Naval Air Systems Command. These are different attributed statements with different specificity, rather than independent confirmations of every element of Schmidt’s narrative.supportsWhat original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procurement route?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.supportsThe journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks original selection and approval records needed to adopt that mechanism as fact.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsAt publication the article records an expected purchase and assistance announcement while retaining unknown quantity and timing. Later awards or payments cannot be back-projected into that source horizon.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spokesman is the stated source for assignment to Naval Air Systems Command. These are different attributed statements with different specificity, rather than independent confirmations of every element of Schmidt’s narrative.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports a December OTC Markets caveat-emptor designation and roughly 80% price fall, and explains several generic reasons for that label. OTC declines to state the actual reason. Schmidt attributes it to an unnamed company lawyer’s stock-disclosure failure; that lawyer declines comment. The generic reasons are not a specific fraud finding, and the unnamed lawyer is not resolved from outside assumptions.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reported demonstration outside Kyiv included Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, a K8 strike on a static armoured personnel carrier and a camera drone relaying the explosion. The article does not identify the configuration, performance criteria, independent test record, US acceptance procedure or broader production capability. A demonstration description is not qualified acceptance or proof of contractual compliance.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reported demonstration outside Kyiv included Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhny, a K8 strike on a static armoured personnel carrier and a camera drone relaying the explosion. The article does not identify the configuration, performance criteria, independent test record, US acceptance procedure or broader production capability. A demonstration description is not qualified acceptance or proof of contractual compliance.supportsWhich dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract and delivery events?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The report frames small drones as an opening for lesser-known firms within more than $32 billion in approved Ukraine security assistance. It says Cyberlux had unsuccessfully pitched the Pentagon and then took a modified movie-production drone directly to Ukraine. Its wording that the Pentagon appears set to buy is prospective at March 2023, not a executed contract, paid order or accepted delivery.supportsDoes this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
A Ukrainian ministry spokesman confirms requests travel through official channels but declines K8-specific comment. A Defence Department spokesman is the stated source for assignment to Naval Air Systems Command. These are different attributed statements with different specificity, rather than independent confirmations of every element of Schmidt’s narrative.supportsThe journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks original selection and approval records needed to adopt that mechanism as fact.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsWhat original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procurement route?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports a December OTC Markets caveat-emptor designation and roughly 80% price fall, and explains several generic reasons for that label. OTC declines to state the actual reason. Schmidt attributes it to an unnamed company lawyer’s stock-disclosure failure; that lawyer declines comment. The generic reasons are not a specific fraud finding, and the unnamed lawyer is not resolved from outside assumptions.supportsWhat actual OTC notice and disclosure records establish the designation’s reason and the unnamed lawyer’s identity?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The report frames small drones as an opening for lesser-known firms within more than $32 billion in approved Ukraine security assistance. It says Cyberlux had unsuccessfully pitched the Pentagon and then took a modified movie-production drone directly to Ukraine. Its wording that the Pentagon appears set to buy is prospective at March 2023, not a executed contract, paid order or accepted delivery.supportsWhich dated award, funding, configuration, test and acceptance records distinguish the reported 1,000-unit request from subsequent contract and delivery events?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The five-page file contains an Exhibit D wrapper and a four-page WSJ print capture of How a Penny-Stock Company Sold the Pentagon on Small Drones for Ukraine. Embedded text identifies Brett Forrest, March 15, 2023 at 9:02 am ET, with Matthew Luxmoore and Lisa Schwartz contributing. The print header is October 30, 2025 at 1:34 pm. The wrapper supplies no docket, sponsor, filing stamp or admission ruling; publication, print and exhibit use are separate events.supportsWhich clean capture, original images and exhibit filing record resolve visual omissions and the provenance of the Exhibit D wrapper?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD declined quantity/timeline details and executives did not yet know them. A listed assistance item and expected purchase do not establish a signed award, unit count, delivery date, advance payment or acceptance.supportsWhich later articles cite this exact story and preserve its byline, attribution and prospective March-2023 limits?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The source is original WSJ reporting containing a mixture of author narrative, Schmidt claims, other company views, attributed official comments and a letter the reporter says was reviewed. The corpus has read this article, not the reporter’s interview notes or that letter. Repetition of this story in later commentary does not create new independent evidence of the underlying events.supportsDoes this article prove a completed K8 contract, payment or accepted delivery by March 2023?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The source is original WSJ reporting containing a mixture of author narrative, Schmidt claims, other company views, attributed official comments and a letter the reporter says was reviewed. The corpus has read this article, not the reporter’s interview notes or that letter. Repetition of this story in later commentary does not create new independent evidence of the underlying events.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement system or being ejected. It attributes the connection to senior Ukrainian officials through an unnamed US drone expert to Schmidt. The expert is not identified as Curtin, Tucker, Maadarani or another actor; the metaphor and access route are not an admission of unlawful conduct.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The original article pages visibly clip line starts and ends and leave several captioned photographs blank. Embedded PDF text retains the complete lines, including byline/date. A local inspection copy with clipping operations removed and page bounds expanded confirmed the recoverable text; it is an inspection transformation, not a new original or repaired evidence file. Native text and original PDF remain preserved, and absent images are not reconstructed.supportsWhich clean capture, original images and exhibit filing record resolve visual omissions and the provenance of the Exhibit D wrapper?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article reports Mark Schmidt’s July trip via Poland to Kyiv and quotes his virus-inside-DOD metaphor for influencing the procurement system or being ejected. It attributes the connection to senior Ukrainian officials through an unnamed US drone expert to Schmidt. The expert is not identified as Curtin, Tucker, Maadarani or another actor; the metaphor and access route are not an admission of unlawful conduct.supportsThe journalist’s access-through-an-established-contractor explanation accurately captures the causal procurement route. The report lacks original selection and approval records needed to adopt that mechanism as fact.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The article says the first-anniversary February 2023 $2 billion assistance announcement listed K8 drones. It then expressly says DOD declined quantity/timeline details and executives did not yet know them. A listed assistance item and expected purchase do not establish a signed award, unit count, delivery date, advance payment or acceptance.supportsAt publication the article records an expected purchase and assistance announcement while retaining unknown quantity and timing. Later awards or payments cannot be back-projected into that source horizon.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsDirect Ukrainian demonstration and linkage to an established contractor may have advanced the procurement request. Test dated request, referral, selection and approval records against alternate pre-existing channels; a different documented sequence would weaken the proposed mechanism.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The November pairing with Huntington Ingalls Industries is attributed to Schmidt; an HII spokesman declines comment. The report explains the established-company route as a way around lengthy procurement bureaucracy. It does not reproduce a contract or establish which HII legal entity, who authorised the selection, whether required approvals were waived or whether the route was unlawful.supportsWhat original Sharapov letter and official referral/selection records establish dates, request scope, authority and the resulting procurement route?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The report frames small drones as an opening for lesser-known firms within more than $32 billion in approved Ukraine security assistance. It says Cyberlux had unsuccessfully pitched the Pentagon and then took a modified movie-production drone directly to Ukraine. Its wording that the Pentagon appears set to buy is prospective at March 2023, not a executed contract, paid order or accepted delivery.supportsAt publication the article records an expected purchase and assistance announcement while retaining unknown quantity and timing. Later awards or payments cannot be back-projected into that source horizon.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The reporter says a letter reviewed by WSJ from Deputy Defence Minister Denys Sharapov requested 1,000 K8 drones from US European Command. The actual letter, date, attachments, authority and funding are not reproduced. The request quantity is not an awarded quantity, the later 2,000-unit contract, or a verified procurement approval.supportsSchmidt-origin claims remain the same origin when quoted by an independent publisher; official comments and a reporter-reviewed but absent letter must retain their separate scope.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Photo captions credit Serhii Korovayny/WSJ for K8 material, AFP/Getty for a Bakhmut serviceman, Fortem for a capture demonstration and the Ukrainian Presidential Press Office/AP for a February Zaluzhny image. The latter caption expressly depicts a different February event while reporting attendance at the earlier demonstration. Blank capture images cannot be described as inspected photographs or treated as proof of who attended.supportsWhich clean capture, original images and exhibit filing record resolve visual omissions and the provenance of the Exhibit D wrapper?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%

WEIGH

Explained weighting

A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.

No published WEIGH run

The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.