Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
observationobservation
August2022 EW-report correspondence: acknowledged routing and unverified test claims
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
On August23,2022 Kristina Malakie replies to Anthony Gonzalez, copying Jorge Cordeiro and Nicholas Viar, “We sent the report to the team.” T
On August23,2022 Kristina Malakie replies to Anthony Gonzalez, copying Jorge Cordeiro and Nicholas Viar, “We sent the report to the team.” This is an express report-routing acknowledgement, not an endorsement of its findings or procurement approval.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000unit
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
Gonzalez says he again attaches a drone cut sheet incorporating changes he attributes to British SAS requests and a letter from LTGShaptala.
Gonzalez says he again attaches a drone cut sheet incorporating changes he attributes to British SAS requests and a letter from LTGShaptala. These are his representations; no cut sheet, request or letter is embedded in this two-page email source.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when availa
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when available. Its following paragraph reports Model-K8 stability/no degradation at stated control-panel distances while5km from a Bukovel-AD EW complex; these are reported test claims without the underlying protocol, measurements or report.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
On August3 Gonzalez reports further Ukrainian testing and EW evasion, saying a report is being generated. Malakie replies with interest in s
On August3 Gonzalez reports further Ukrainian testing and EW evasion, saying a report is being generated. Malakie replies with interest in seeing the report when available and says additional information will be requested if needed. This earlier interest differs from August23’s later routing acknowledgement.
Read the anchor · page 2
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 2 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
The letter is finally coming. I have a part of the draft and expect to see it on UKR MOD
letterhead today. As soon as I have the official version, I'll forward it to you.
During this testing, the Model-K8 showed stability and no performance degradation at a distance 5 km, 1
km and 500 meters from the control panel at a distance of 5 km from the Electronic Warfare complex with
the Bukovel - AD UAV.
From: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:08 AM
To: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>; Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA
(USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA)
<nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Anthony,
Thank you for reaching out. Should we require additional information we will let you know.
Certainly interested in seeing that report when it comes out if you are willing to share.
Thanks.
v/r
Kris
From: "Anthony Gonzalez" <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 2:38:01 AM
To: "Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA)" <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>,
"Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA)" <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>, "Viar,
Nicholas D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA)" <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Attack Drone
Good morning from Brussels,
I thought I'd try you once more. We had more testing in UKR and we also evaded their EW
attacks on our drone. They are generating a report we can share soon.
Let me know if we can discuss further
V/r
AG
claimallegation
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipien
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipient’s report-routing reply. It does not independently authenticate the missing report, confirm the attributed foreign requests, or establish aircraft capability or a funded order.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
claimallegation
The2/11/24 print header is later than the August2022 correspondence. No source attachment bytes, licence, order, payment, training record or
The2/11/24 print header is later than the August2022 correspondence. No source attachment bytes, licence, order, payment, training record or test data accompany this PDF.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
otherattribution
Gonzalez says he will forward the official version of the letter when he has it; completion is not independently established by this promise
Gonzalez says he will forward the official version of the letter when he has it; completion is not independently established by this promise.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
entityobservation
Anthony Gonzalez
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
entityobservation
Malakie, Kristina M
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
entityobservation
Cordeiro, Jorge O
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
entityobservation
Viar, Nicholas D
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
entityobservation
LTG Shaptala
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
eventattribution
Report promised and recipient expresses interest.
Read the anchor · page 2
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 2 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
The letter is finally coming. I have a part of the draft and expect to see it on UKR MOD
letterhead today. As soon as I have the official version, I'll forward it to you.
During this testing, the Model-K8 showed stability and no performance degradation at a distance 5 km, 1
km and 500 meters from the control panel at a distance of 5 km from the Electronic Warfare complex with
the Bukovel - AD UAV.
From: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 7:08 AM
To: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>; Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA
(USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA)
<nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Anthony,
Thank you for reaching out. Should we require additional information we will let you know.
Certainly interested in seeing that report when it comes out if you are willing to share.
Thanks.
v/r
Kris
From: "Anthony Gonzalez" <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 at 2:38:01 AM
To: "Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA)" <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>,
"Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA)" <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>, "Viar,
Nicholas D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA)" <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Attack Drone
Good morning from Brussels,
I thought I'd try you once more. We had more testing in UKR and we also evaded their EW
attacks on our drone. They are generating a report we can share soon.
Let me know if we can discuss further
V/r
AG
eventattribution
Partial draft and official-version expectation stated.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
inferenceinference
A recipient’s explicit forwarding statement supports actual report circulation more strongly than an unanswered sales email, but it validate
A recipient’s explicit forwarding statement supports actual report circulation more strongly than an unanswered sales email, but it validates transmission/routing only, not the reported test outcome.
inferenceinference
The staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching i
The staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching is needed before treating these references as one authenticated final report.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 8b1a4a4e0aeddcae12a60c717b84da997be3ad71ad9a9395c1041a33c1f79986. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 8b1a4a4e0aeddcae12a60c717b84da997be3ad71ad9a9395c1041a33c1f79986. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Both complete pages and own page images read. Source dates, each speaker and the later print header are kept distinct; missing attachments are not treated as read.
Read the anchor · page 1
2/11/24, 12:18 PM
Page 1 of 2https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkAGRhMDU3NmY3LT…Dc2Ni05MWM3LTQ2MjM2MWI4YzI1ZgAQADMm%2FJ3SI1VBhWbrwyoJ2rU%3D
RE: Attack Drone
Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>
Tue 8/23/2022 11:11 AM
To:Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Cc:Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>;Viar, Nicholas D LTC USARMY
DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Thanks Anthony. We sent the report to the team.
v/r
Kris
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Attack Drone
See attached. The report on the EW testing we did in Kyiv.
We still have the request from the UKR LTG for 1000 units. If there is any way to get
contacts for the EUCOM J5 and ODC in UKR that would be helpful. I have a team in Lviv
now training some troops from their Alpha group and some other special units.
After this week, they will be well trained and be able to train others as well.
I look forward to hearing back. I am attaching, again, the cut sheet for the drone as there
have been a few tweeks as requested by the British SAS, and the letter from LTG Shaptala.
v/r
AG
From: Anthony Gonzalez <agonzalez@cyberlux.com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:49 AM
To: Malakie, Kristina M CIV DSCA IOPS WPNS WPI (USA) <kristina.m.malakie.civ@mail.mil>;
Cordeiro, Jorge O COL USARMY DSCA DSA (USA) <jorge.o.cordeiro.mil@mail.mil>; Viar, Nicholas
D LTC USARMY DSCA IOPS WPNS (USA) <nicholas.d.viar.mil@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: Attack Drone
Good morning,
questionquestion
Which exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
questionquestion
What underlying test, training and procurement evidence independently substantiates Gonzalez’s capability and1,000-unit-request statements?
attribution
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.associated withItem5 certifies an order and lists two500-unit FlightEye MODEL-K8, modelKOA031800-2 rows: an AP-labelled configuration valued$20,254,000 and an HEDP-labelled configuration valued$18,450,000. Both are classified on the form as USMLVIII(a)(5). The rows total1,000units/$38,704,000 arithmetically; that is stated certificate value, not payment, delivery or an independently determined classification.
Both source records refer to1,000units. This shared quantity is a reconciliation lead only: email request and certificate order are not proved the same instrument or an approved purchase.
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.supportsWhich exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
On August3 Gonzalez reports further Ukrainian testing and EW evasion, saying a report is being generated. Malakie replies with interest in seeing the report when available and says additional information will be requested if needed. This earlier interest differs from August23’s later routing acknowledgement.supportsA recipient’s explicit forwarding statement supports actual report circulation more strongly than an unanswered sales email, but it validates transmission/routing only, not the reported test outcome.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when available. Its following paragraph reports Model-K8 stability/no degradation at stated control-panel distances while5km from a Bukovel-AD EW complex; these are reported test claims without the underlying protocol, measurements or report.supportsWhich exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipient’s report-routing reply. It does not independently authenticate the missing report, confirm the attributed foreign requests, or establish aircraft capability or a funded order.supportsThe staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching is needed before treating these references as one authenticated final report.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when available. Its following paragraph reports Model-K8 stability/no degradation at stated control-panel distances while5km from a Bukovel-AD EW complex; these are reported test claims without the underlying protocol, measurements or report.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.supportsWhat underlying test, training and procurement evidence independently substantiates Gonzalez’s capability and1,000-unit-request statements?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipient’s report-routing reply. It does not independently authenticate the missing report, confirm the attributed foreign requests, or establish aircraft capability or a funded order.supportsA recipient’s explicit forwarding statement supports actual report circulation more strongly than an unanswered sales email, but it validates transmission/routing only, not the reported test outcome.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The2/11/24 print header is later than the August2022 correspondence. No source attachment bytes, licence, order, payment, training record or test data accompany this PDF.supportsWhat underlying test, training and procurement evidence independently substantiates Gonzalez’s capability and1,000-unit-request statements?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
On August3 Gonzalez reports further Ukrainian testing and EW evasion, saying a report is being generated. Malakie replies with interest in seeing the report when available and says additional information will be requested if needed. This earlier interest differs from August23’s later routing acknowledgement.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The2/11/24 print header is later than the August2022 correspondence. No source attachment bytes, licence, order, payment, training record or test data accompany this PDF.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Gonzalez says he again attaches a drone cut sheet incorporating changes he attributes to British SAS requests and a letter from LTGShaptala. These are his representations; no cut sheet, request or letter is embedded in this two-page email source.supportsWhich exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
On August23,2022 Kristina Malakie replies to Anthony Gonzalez, copying Jorge Cordeiro and Nicholas Viar, “We sent the report to the team.” This is an express report-routing acknowledgement, not an endorsement of its findings or procurement approval.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when available. Its following paragraph reports Model-K8 stability/no degradation at stated control-panel distances while5km from a Bukovel-AD EW complex; these are reported test claims without the underlying protocol, measurements or report.supportsThe staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching is needed before treating these references as one authenticated final report.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The2/11/24 print header is later than the August2022 correspondence. No source attachment bytes, licence, order, payment, training record or test data accompany this PDF.supportsWhich exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipient’s report-routing reply. It does not independently authenticate the missing report, confirm the attributed foreign requests, or establish aircraft capability or a funded order.supportsWhat underlying test, training and procurement evidence independently substantiates Gonzalez’s capability and1,000-unit-request statements?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Earlier that morning Gonzalez says he attaches a Kyiv EW-testing report, repeats a claimed Ukrainian lieutenant-general request for1,000units and seeks EUCOMJ5/UkraineODC contacts. He describes a Lviv training team and predicts trainees will train others after the week; no training results or procurement instrument are included.supportsThe staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching is needed before treating these references as one authenticated final report.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Gonzalez says he again attaches a drone cut sheet incorporating changes he attributes to British SAS requests and a letter from LTGShaptala. These are his representations; no cut sheet, request or letter is embedded in this two-page email source.supportsThe staged language distinguishes a draft, an expected official version and a later reported attachment; exact attachment/version matching is needed before treating these references as one authenticated final report.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
On August23,2022 Kristina Malakie replies to Anthony Gonzalez, copying Jorge Cordeiro and Nicholas Viar, “We sent the report to the team.” This is an express report-routing acknowledgement, not an endorsement of its findings or procurement approval.supportsA recipient’s explicit forwarding statement supports actual report circulation more strongly than an unanswered sales email, but it validates transmission/routing only, not the reported test outcome.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Gonzalez says he again attaches a drone cut sheet incorporating changes he attributes to British SAS requests and a letter from LTGShaptala. These are his representations; no cut sheet, request or letter is embedded in this two-page email source.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The chain records a progression from report promised, to partial draft expected on official letterhead, to claimed attachment and a recipient’s report-routing reply. It does not independently authenticate the missing report, confirm the attributed foreign requests, or establish aircraft capability or a funded order.supportsWhat does this correspondence establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August22 message says Gonzalez has only part of a draft letter, expects MOD letterhead and will forward the official version when available. Its following paragraph reports Model-K8 stability/no degradation at stated control-panel distances while5km from a Bukovel-AD EW complex; these are reported test claims without the underlying protocol, measurements or report.supportsWhat underlying test, training and procurement evidence independently substantiates Gonzalez’s capability and1,000-unit-request statements?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
On August23,2022 Kristina Malakie replies to Anthony Gonzalez, copying Jorge Cordeiro and Nicholas Viar, “We sent the report to the team.” This is an express report-routing acknowledgement, not an endorsement of its findings or procurement approval.supportsWhich exact report, cut sheet and Shaptala letter were forwarded, and what recipient/version records authenticate them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.